Banking Exam PCI202548

1. What is the ratio between male employees working in the
country I and country II respectively?

What is the ratio between the number of male employees
and female employees in country II?

What is the approximate average number of male employees
in countries I, II and III ?

What is the average number of female employees in the
countries IV and VII?

If an increase of 40% is made in the average number of
female employees, working in countries III, IV and V, then
their resulting average number will be what per cent of the
average number of female employees?

By what per cent is the total number of employees in
countries V, VI and VII more than the number of male
employees working in the countries II, III and IV?

1. Number of girls enrolled in Dancing form what per cent of
total number of students in the school? (rounded off to two
digits after decimal)

How many boys are enrolled in Singing and Craft together?

What is the respective ratio of number of girls enrolled in
Swimming to the number of boys enrolled in Swimming ?

What is the total number of girls enrolled in Swimming and
Drawing together ?

What is the approximate percentage of boys in the school?

A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circle facing the centre. B is 2nd to the right of D who is 3rd to the right of F. C is 2nd to the left of A who is 2nd to the left of F. G is 3rd to right of E.

1. In which of the following combination is the 1st person sitting between the 2nd and the 3rd persons?

A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circle facing the centre. B is 2nd to the right of D who is 3rd to the right of F. C is 2nd to the left of A who is 2nd to the left of F. G is 3rd to right of E.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circle facing the centre. B is 2nd to the right of D who is 3rd to the right of F. C is 2nd to the left of A who is 2nd to the left of F. G is 3rd to right of E.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circle facing the centre. B is 2nd to the right of D who is 3rd to the right of F. C is 2nd to the left of A who is 2nd to the left of F. G is 3rd to right of E.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circle facing the centre. B is 2nd to the right of D who is 3rd to the right of F. C is 2nd to the left of A who is 2nd to the left of F. G is 3rd to right of E.

(i) A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circle facing the centre but not necessarily in the same order. (ii) B sits second to left of H’s husband. No female is an immediate neighbour of B. (iii) D’s daughter sits second to right of F, F is the sister of G. F is not an immediate neightbour of H’s husband. (iv) Only one person sits between A and F. A is the father of G. H’s brother D sits to the immediate left of H’s mother. Only one person sits between H’s mother and E. (v) Only one person sits between H and G. G is the mother of C. G is not an immediate neighbour of E.

1. What is position of A with respect of his mother-in-law?

(i) A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circle facing the centre but not necessarily in the same order. (ii) B sits second to left of H’s husband. No female is an immediate neighbour of B. (iii) D’s daughter sits second to right of F, F is the sister of G. F is not an immediate neightbour of H’s husband. (iv) Only one person sits between A and F. A is the father of G. H’s brother D sits to the immediate left of H’s mother. Only one person sits between H’s mother and E. (v) Only one person sits between H and G. G is the mother of C. G is not an immediate neighbour of E.

(i) A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circle facing the centre but not necessarily in the same order. (ii) B sits second to left of H’s husband. No female is an immediate neighbour of B. (iii) D’s daughter sits second to right of F, F is the sister of G. F is not an immediate neightbour of H’s husband. (iv) Only one person sits between A and F. A is the father of G. H’s brother D sits to the immediate left of H’s mother. Only one person sits between H’s mother and E. (v) Only one person sits between H and G. G is the mother of C. G is not an immediate neighbour of E.

(i) A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circle facing the centre but not necessarily in the same order. (ii) B sits second to left of H’s husband. No female is an immediate neighbour of B. (iii) D’s daughter sits second to right of F, F is the sister of G. F is not an immediate neightbour of H’s husband. (iv) Only one person sits between A and F. A is the father of G. H’s brother D sits to the immediate left of H’s mother. Only one person sits between H’s mother and E. (v) Only one person sits between H and G. G is the mother of C. G is not an immediate neighbour of E.

A well-known stock market sell signal is a company splurging on flashy new headquarters. It might then be time to go short the City of London. From the Shard, the tallest building in the European Union, the view is of a crowded skyline of fellow concept skyscrapers. There is the Gherkin, the Cheese grater, the Walkie Talkie and, rising in their midst, 22 Bishopsgate, which will be the Square Mile’s tallest and most capacious tower. The building frenzy is even accelerating. Londoners are waiting to
hear if the 1,000-foot Tulip—with a design that many contend is more phallic than floral—will be approved. None of this suggests a financial centre bracing for Britain’s
departure from the European Union. But as soon as Theresa May, the prime minister, made leaving the single market a “red line” after the Brexit referendum in 2016, it seemed likely that the City would be sundered from its biggest foreign market. Regulators on both sides of the Channel scrambled to ensure business continuity and financial stability. British firms were asked to draw up contingency plans, including opening hubs in the EU27. For much of the City, Brexit happened sometime last year. According to New Financial, a think tank in London, 291 big financial firms have moved some activities or people to the EU 27, or opened legal entities there. Many contingency plans were
triggered before March 29th, when Brexit was supposed to have happened. In the run-up to the extended deadline of October 31st, a wave of staff and their families will head off to new digs, offices and schools. The moves do not seem hasty. Though Brexit’s final form is unclear, only the softest of departures would keep Britain in the single market. And nothing short of that would safeguard “passporting” rights for City firms. These allow financial firms in any EU country to sell in any other and matter hugely in banking and asset management. In 2016, 5,476 firms based in Britain used 336,421 passports to sell in the EU. Around 8,000 firms in the European Economic Area, where much of the EU’s
writ runs, used 23,535 of them to offer services in Britain. Financial services account for 6.5% of Britain’s economic output and 11% of its tax revenue. The sector and its ecosystem of lawyers, consultants, lobbyists and the like employ 2.2m people, not only in the wealthy centres of the Square Mile, Canary Wharf and Edinburgh but also in places like Cardiff and Bournemouth. Yet Britain’s negotiators have treated the industry as a sideshow. The government took the view that the City is strong enough to cope, and made little effort to keep passporting, which would have meant blurring Mrs May’s red lines. Nor did it press hard for “mutual recognition”, in which the EU would accept Britain’s rules
as a basis for future trading as long as they did not diverge too much. The City is likely instead to be left with “equivalence”, a piecemeal status that the EU sometimes grants to third countries.

1.Which of the following is true as per the passage?

I. Britain has been given piecemeal status by the EU.
II. Britain has tried hard but failed to get mutual recognition from EU.
III. EU has accepted Britain’s rules as it did not diverge a lot from what it wants.

A well-known stock market sell signal is a company splurging on flashy new headquarters. It might then be time to go short the City of London. From the Shard, the tallest building in the European Union, the view is of a crowded skyline of fellow concept skyscrapers. There is the Gherkin, the Cheese grater, the Walkie Talkie and, rising in their midst, 22 Bishopsgate, which will be the Square Mile’s tallest and most capacious tower. The building frenzy is even accelerating. Londoners are waiting to
hear if the 1,000-foot Tulip—with a design that many contend is more phallic than floral—will be approved. None of this suggests a financial centre bracing for Britain’s
departure from the European Union. But as soon as Theresa May, the prime minister, made leaving the single market a “red line” after the Brexit referendum in 2016, it seemed likely that the City would be sundered from its biggest foreign market. Regulators on both sides of the Channel scrambled to ensure business continuity and financial stability. British firms were asked to draw up contingency plans, including opening hubs in the EU27. For much of the City, Brexit happened sometime last year. According to New Financial, a think tank in London, 291 big financial firms have moved some activities or people to the EU 27, or opened legal entities there. Many contingency plans were
triggered before March 29th, when Brexit was supposed to have happened. In the run-up to the extended deadline of October 31st, a wave of staff and their families will head off to new digs, offices and schools. The moves do not seem hasty. Though Brexit’s final form is unclear, only the softest of departures would keep Britain in the single market. And nothing short of that would safeguard “passporting” rights for City firms. These allow financial firms in any EU country to sell in any other and matter hugely in banking and asset management. In 2016, 5,476 firms based in Britain used 336,421 passports to sell in the EU. Around 8,000 firms in the European Economic Area, where much of the EU’s
writ runs, used 23,535 of them to offer services in Britain. Financial services account for 6.5% of Britain’s economic output and 11% of its tax revenue. The sector and its ecosystem of lawyers, consultants, lobbyists and the like employ 2.2m people, not only in the wealthy centres of the Square Mile, Canary Wharf and Edinburgh but also in places like Cardiff and Bournemouth. Yet Britain’s negotiators have treated the industry as a sideshow. The government took the view that the City is strong enough to cope, and made little effort to keep passporting, which would have meant blurring Mrs May’s red lines. Nor did it press hard for “mutual recognition”, in which the EU would accept Britain’s rules
as a basis for future trading as long as they did not diverge too much. The City is likely instead to be left with “equivalence”, a piecemeal status that the EU sometimes grants to third countries.

2 .Which of the following is most opposite in meaning to the word capacious as mentioned in the passage?

I. Abundant
II. cramped
III. Frenzied
IV. Ample
V. narrow

A well-known stock market sell signal is a company splurging on flashy new headquarters. It might then be time to go short the City of London. From the Shard, the tallest building in the European Union, the view is of a crowded skyline of fellow concept skyscrapers. There is the Gherkin, the Cheese grater, the Walkie Talkie and, rising in their midst, 22 Bishopsgate, which will be the Square Mile’s tallest and most capacious tower. The building frenzy is even accelerating. Londoners are waiting to
hear if the 1,000-foot Tulip—with a design that many contend is more phallic than floral—will be approved. None of this suggests a financial centre bracing for Britain’s
departure from the European Union. But as soon as Theresa May, the prime minister, made leaving the single market a “red line” after the Brexit referendum in 2016, it seemed likely that the City would be sundered from its biggest foreign market. Regulators on both sides of the Channel scrambled to ensure business continuity and financial stability. British firms were asked to draw up contingency plans, including opening hubs in the EU27. For much of the City, Brexit happened sometime last year. According to New Financial, a think tank in London, 291 big financial firms have moved some activities or people to the EU 27, or opened legal entities there. Many contingency plans were
triggered before March 29th, when Brexit was supposed to have happened. In the run-up to the extended deadline of October 31st, a wave of staff and their families will head off to new digs, offices and schools. The moves do not seem hasty. Though Brexit’s final form is unclear, only the softest of departures would keep Britain in the single market. And nothing short of that would safeguard “passporting” rights for City firms. These allow financial firms in any EU country to sell in any other and matter hugely in banking and asset management. In 2016, 5,476 firms based in Britain used 336,421 passports to sell in the EU. Around 8,000 firms in the European Economic Area, where much of the EU’s
writ runs, used 23,535 of them to offer services in Britain. Financial services account for 6.5% of Britain’s economic output and 11% of its tax revenue. The sector and its ecosystem of lawyers, consultants, lobbyists and the like employ 2.2m people, not only in the wealthy centres of the Square Mile, Canary Wharf and Edinburgh but also in places like Cardiff and Bournemouth. Yet Britain’s negotiators have treated the industry as a sideshow. The government took the view that the City is strong enough to cope, and made little effort to keep passporting, which would have meant blurring Mrs May’s red lines. Nor did it press hard for “mutual recognition”, in which the EU would accept Britain’s rules
as a basis for future trading as long as they did not diverge too much. The City is likely instead to be left with “equivalence”, a piecemeal status that the EU sometimes grants to third countries.

3 .Why is being a part of the ‘Single Market’ so important for Britain?

A well-known stock market sell signal is a company splurging on flashy new headquarters. It might then be time to go short the City of London. From the Shard, the tallest building in the European Union, the view is of a crowded skyline of fellow concept skyscrapers. There is the Gherkin, the Cheese grater, the Walkie Talkie and, rising in their midst, 22 Bishopsgate, which will be the Square Mile’s tallest and most capacious tower. The building frenzy is even accelerating. Londoners are waiting to
hear if the 1,000-foot Tulip—with a design that many contend is more phallic than floral—will be approved. None of this suggests a financial centre bracing for Britain’s
departure from the European Union. But as soon as Theresa May, the prime minister, made leaving the single market a “red line” after the Brexit referendum in 2016, it seemed likely that the City would be sundered from its biggest foreign market. Regulators on both sides of the Channel scrambled to ensure business continuity and financial stability. British firms were asked to draw up contingency plans, including opening hubs in the EU27. For much of the City, Brexit happened sometime last year. According to New Financial, a think tank in London, 291 big financial firms have moved some activities or people to the EU 27, or opened legal entities there. Many contingency plans were
triggered before March 29th, when Brexit was supposed to have happened. In the run-up to the extended deadline of October 31st, a wave of staff and their families will head off to new digs, offices and schools. The moves do not seem hasty. Though Brexit’s final form is unclear, only the softest of departures would keep Britain in the single market. And nothing short of that would safeguard “passporting” rights for City firms. These allow financial firms in any EU country to sell in any other and matter hugely in banking and asset management. In 2016, 5,476 firms based in Britain used 336,421 passports to sell in the EU. Around 8,000 firms in the European Economic Area, where much of the EU’s
writ runs, used 23,535 of them to offer services in Britain. Financial services account for 6.5% of Britain’s economic output and 11% of its tax revenue. The sector and its ecosystem of lawyers, consultants, lobbyists and the like employ 2.2m people, not only in the wealthy centres of the Square Mile, Canary Wharf and Edinburgh but also in places like Cardiff and Bournemouth. Yet Britain’s negotiators have treated the industry as a sideshow. The government took the view that the City is strong enough to cope, and made little effort to keep passporting, which would have meant blurring Mrs May’s red lines. Nor did it press hard for “mutual recognition”, in which the EU would accept Britain’s rules
as a basis for future trading as long as they did not diverge too much. The City is likely instead to be left with “equivalence”, a piecemeal status that the EU sometimes grants to third countries.

4.Which of the following could be a possible consequence of businesses moving out of Britain?

I. The nation would probably lose some of its assets.
II. This would temporarily increase business opportunities for other EU nations.
III. There may be a shift of people from Britain to other nations in the EU.

A well-known stock market sell signal is a company splurging on flashy new headquarters. It might then be time to go short the City of London. From the Shard, the tallest building in the European Union, the view is of a crowded skyline of fellow concept skyscrapers. There is the Gherkin, the Cheese grater, the Walkie Talkie and, rising in their midst, 22 Bishopsgate, which will be the Square Mile’s tallest and most capacious tower. The building frenzy is even accelerating. Londoners are waiting to
hear if the 1,000-foot Tulip—with a design that many contend is more phallic than floral—will be approved. None of this suggests a financial centre bracing for Britain’s
departure from the European Union. But as soon as Theresa May, the prime minister, made leaving the single market a “red line” after the Brexit referendum in 2016, it seemed likely that the City would be sundered from its biggest foreign market. Regulators on both sides of the Channel scrambled to ensure business continuity and financial stability. British firms were asked to draw up contingency plans, including opening hubs in the EU27. For much of the City, Brexit happened sometime last year. According to New Financial, a think tank in London, 291 big financial firms have moved some activities or people to the EU 27, or opened legal entities there. Many contingency plans were
triggered before March 29th, when Brexit was supposed to have happened. In the run-up to the extended deadline of October 31st, a wave of staff and their families will head off to new digs, offices and schools. The moves do not seem hasty. Though Brexit’s final form is unclear, only the softest of departures would keep Britain in the single market. And nothing short of that would safeguard “passporting” rights for City firms. These allow financial firms in any EU country to sell in any other and matter hugely in banking and asset management. In 2016, 5,476 firms based in Britain used 336,421 passports to sell in the EU. Around 8,000 firms in the European Economic Area, where much of the EU’s
writ runs, used 23,535 of them to offer services in Britain. Financial services account for 6.5% of Britain’s economic output and 11% of its tax revenue. The sector and its ecosystem of lawyers, consultants, lobbyists and the like employ 2.2m people, not only in the wealthy centres of the Square Mile, Canary Wharf and Edinburgh but also in places like Cardiff and Bournemouth. Yet Britain’s negotiators have treated the industry as a sideshow. The government took the view that the City is strong enough to cope, and made little effort to keep passporting, which would have meant blurring Mrs May’s red lines. Nor did it press hard for “mutual recognition”, in which the EU would accept Britain’s rules
as a basis for future trading as long as they did not diverge too much. The City is likely instead to be left with “equivalence”, a piecemeal status that the EU sometimes grants to third countries.

5 .What does the author mean by the statement- ‘For much of the City, Brexit happened sometime last year’?

A well-known stock market sell signal is a company splurging on flashy new headquarters. It might then be time to go short the City of London. From the Shard, the tallest building in the European Union, the view is of a crowded skyline of fellow concept skyscrapers. There is the Gherkin, the Cheese grater, the Walkie Talkie and, rising in their midst, 22 Bishopsgate, which will be the Square Mile’s tallest and most capacious tower. The building frenzy is even accelerating. Londoners are waiting to
hear if the 1,000-foot Tulip—with a design that many contend is more phallic than floral—will be approved. None of this suggests a financial centre bracing for Britain’s
departure from the European Union. But as soon as Theresa May, the prime minister, made leaving the single market a “red line” after the Brexit referendum in 2016, it seemed likely that the City would be sundered from its biggest foreign market. Regulators on both sides of the Channel scrambled to ensure business continuity and financial stability. British firms were asked to draw up contingency plans, including opening hubs in the EU27. For much of the City, Brexit happened sometime last year. According to New Financial, a think tank in London, 291 big financial firms have moved some activities or people to the EU 27, or opened legal entities there. Many contingency plans were
triggered before March 29th, when Brexit was supposed to have happened. In the run-up to the extended deadline of October 31st, a wave of staff and their families will head off to new digs, offices and schools. The moves do not seem hasty. Though Brexit’s final form is unclear, only the softest of departures would keep Britain in the single market. And nothing short of that would safeguard “passporting” rights for City firms. These allow financial firms in any EU country to sell in any other and matter hugely in banking and asset management. In 2016, 5,476 firms based in Britain used 336,421 passports to sell in the EU. Around 8,000 firms in the European Economic Area, where much of the EU’s
writ runs, used 23,535 of them to offer services in Britain. Financial services account for 6.5% of Britain’s economic output and 11% of its tax revenue. The sector and its ecosystem of lawyers, consultants, lobbyists and the like employ 2.2m people, not only in the wealthy centres of the Square Mile, Canary Wharf and Edinburgh but also in places like Cardiff and Bournemouth. Yet Britain’s negotiators have treated the industry as a sideshow. The government took the view that the City is strong enough to cope, and made little effort to keep passporting, which would have meant blurring Mrs May’s red lines. Nor did it press hard for “mutual recognition”, in which the EU would accept Britain’s rules
as a basis for future trading as long as they did not diverge too much. The City is likely instead to be left with “equivalence”, a piecemeal status that the EU sometimes grants to third countries.

6 .What does the author mean by the statement- ‘Yet Britain’s negotiators have treated the industry as a sideshow’?

(A) Both Ram and Sham realised their mistakes and were ashamed about what they had said.
(B) Vivek happened to overhear their conversation and was very angry with both of them for criticising the tree.
(C) Two friends, Ram and Sham, were seeking respite from the searing heat of the midday sun when they saw a hug leafy tree.
(D) “It’s a plain tree,” said his friend. “Don’t waste your time looking for fruits. It produces neither edible fruits nor good wood. It’s one of the most useless trees around.”
(E) “How can you say such a thing when you’re enjoying the shade of this beautiful tree at this very moment?” snapped Vivek, unable to control his anger.
(F) They took shelter under the huge leafy tree and soon felt cool and refreshed.
(G) Busy belittling the tree, both Ram and Sham did not notice that another person, Vivek, was lying on the other side of the tree taking shelter.
(H) “What sort of tree is this? Does it produce edible fruits?” asked Ram.
1. Which of the following should be the SECOND sentence after rearrangement?

(A) Both Ram and Sham realised their mistakes and were ashamed about what they had said.
(B) Vivek happened to overhear their conversation and was very angry with both of them for criticising the tree.
(C) Two friends, Ram and Sham, were seeking respite from the searing heat of the midday sun when they saw a hug leafy tree.
(D) “It’s a plain tree,” said his friend. “Don’t waste your time looking for fruits. It produces neither edible fruits nor good wood. It’s one of the most useless trees around.”
(E) “How can you say such a thing when you’re enjoying the shade of this beautiful tree at this very moment?” snapped Vivek, unable to control his anger.
(F) They took shelter under the huge leafy tree and soon felt cool and refreshed.
(G) Busy belittling the tree, both Ram and Sham did not notice that another person, Vivek, was lying on the other side of the tree taking shelter.
(H) “What sort of tree is this? Does it produce edible fruits?” asked Ram.

2. Which of the following should be the EIGHTH (LAST) sentence after rearrangement?

(A) Both Ram and Sham realised their mistakes and were ashamed about what they had said.
(B) Vivek happened to overhear their conversation and was very angry with both of them for criticising the tree.
(C) Two friends, Ram and Sham, were seeking respite from the searing heat of the midday sun when they saw a hug leafy tree.
(D) “It’s a plain tree,” said his friend. “Don’t waste your time looking for fruits. It produces neither edible fruits nor good wood. It’s one of the most useless trees around.”
(E) “How can you say such a thing when you’re enjoying the shade of this beautiful tree at this very moment?” snapped Vivek, unable to control his anger.
(F) They took shelter under the huge leafy tree and soon felt cool and refreshed.
(G) Busy belittling the tree, both Ram and Sham did not notice that another person, Vivek, was lying on the other side of the tree taking shelter.
(H) “What sort of tree is this? Does it produce edible fruits?” asked Ram.

3. Which of the following should be the FIFTH sentence after rearrangement?

(A) Both Ram and Sham realised their mistakes and were ashamed about what they had said.
(B) Vivek happened to overhear their conversation and was very angry with both of them for criticising the tree.
(C) Two friends, Ram and Sham, were seeking respite from the searing heat of the midday sun when they saw a hug leafy tree.
(D) “It’s a plain tree,” said his friend. “Don’t waste your time looking for fruits. It produces neither edible fruits nor good wood. It’s one of the most useless trees around.”
(E) “How can you say such a thing when you’re enjoying the shade of this beautiful tree at this very moment?” snapped Vivek, unable to control his anger.
(F) They took shelter under the huge leafy tree and soon felt cool and refreshed.
(G) Busy belittling the tree, both Ram and Sham did not notice that another person, Vivek, was lying on the other side of the tree taking shelter.
(H) “What sort of tree is this? Does it produce edible fruits?” asked Ram.

4. Which of the following should be the FIRST sentence after rearrangement?

(A) Both Ram and Sham realised their mistakes and were ashamed about what they had said.
(B) Vivek happened to overhear their conversation and was very angry with both of them for criticising the tree.
(C) Two friends, Ram and Sham, were seeking respite from the searing heat of the midday sun when they saw a hug leafy tree.
(D) “It’s a plain tree,” said his friend. “Don’t waste your time looking for fruits. It produces neither edible fruits nor good wood. It’s one of the most useless trees around.”
(E) “How can you say such a thing when you’re enjoying the shade of this beautiful tree at this very moment?” snapped Vivek, unable to control his anger.
(F) They took shelter under the huge leafy tree and soon felt cool and refreshed.
(G) Busy belittling the tree, both Ram and Sham did not notice that another person, Vivek, was lying on the other side of the tree taking shelter.
(H) “What sort of tree is this? Does it produce edible fruits?” asked Ram.

5. Which of the following should be the FOURTH sentence after rearrangement?

The economics of owning and running a Ration Shop. the familiar name for the outlets in our Public Distribution System (PDS). are such that under normal business terms, the shopowner could never make a prof. it. Yet. (1) The government announces that new permits for ration shops will be given out, there is frenzy in the market to grab one of these. (2)? The answer Is obvious: the business is not for the honest and If one knows the (3), there Is a fortune to be made. What are these tricks of the trade? Getting fake names into the user list is the most obvious option; the State seems to be (4) a losing battle against this practice. Judging by the endless efforts to weed out bogus ration cards. The next Is to get the 'right customers' on the list, not Just more customers. These are people who are registered but who do not have any interest in (5) on their entitlements.

The economics of owning and running a Ration Shop. the familiar name for the outlets in our Public Distribution System (PDS). are such that under normal business terms, the shopowner could never make a prof. it. Yet. (1) The government announces that new permits for ration shops will be given out, there is frenzy in the market to grab one of these. (2)? The answer Is obvious: the business is not for the honest and If one knows the (3), there Is a fortune to be made. What are these tricks of the trade? Getting fake names into the user list is the most obvious option; the State seems to be (4) a losing battle against this practice. Judging by the endless efforts to weed out bogus ration cards. The next Is to get the 'right customers' on the list, not Just more customers. These are people who are registered but who do not have any interest in (5) on their entitlements.

The economics of owning and running a Ration Shop. the familiar name for the outlets in our Public Distribution System (PDS). are such that under normal business terms, the shopowner could never make a prof. it. Yet. (1) The government announces that new permits for ration shops will be given out, there is frenzy in the market to grab one of these. (2)? The answer Is obvious: the business is not for the honest and If one knows the (3), there Is a fortune to be made. What are these tricks of the trade? Getting fake names into the user list is the most obvious option; the State seems to be (4) a losing battle against this practice. Judging by the endless efforts to weed out bogus ration cards. The next Is to get the 'right customers' on the list, not Just more customers. These are people who are registered but who do not have any interest in (5) on their entitlements.

The economics of owning and running a Ration Shop. the familiar name for the outlets in our Public Distribution System (PDS). are such that under normal business terms, the shopowner could never make a prof. it. Yet. (1) The government announces that new permits for ration shops will be given out, there is frenzy in the market to grab one of these. (2)? The answer Is obvious: the business is not for the honest and If one knows the (3), there Is a fortune to be made. What are these tricks of the trade? Getting fake names into the user list is the most obvious option; the State seems to be (4) a losing battle against this practice. Judging by the endless efforts to weed out bogus ration cards. The next Is to get the 'right customers' on the list, not Just more customers. These are people who are registered but who do not have any interest in (5) on their entitlements.

The economics of owning and running a Ration Shop. the familiar name for the outlets in our Public Distribution System (PDS). are such that under normal business terms, the shopowner could never make a prof. it. Yet. (1) The government announces that new permits for ration shops will be given out, there is frenzy in the market to grab one of these. (2)? The answer Is obvious: the business is not for the honest and If one knows the (3), there Is a fortune to be made. What are these tricks of the trade? Getting fake names into the user list is the most obvious option; the State seems to be (4) a losing battle against this practice. Judging by the endless efforts to weed out bogus ration cards. The next Is to get the 'right customers' on the list, not Just more customers. These are people who are registered but who do not have any interest in (5) on their entitlements.